Showing posts with label m42. Show all posts
Showing posts with label m42. Show all posts
Tuesday, March 24, 2015
Rokinon Automatic MC 1:2.8 f=24mm
A while back the external hard drive that I had a lot of my older negative scans stopped working. Unfortunately, I hadn't gotten around to backing it up. I figured it was just a problem with the case and that the drive was probably okay. Anyway it took me a while to get around to taking the case apart and putting the drive in another case. Fortunately once I did I was able to see the drive again. And this time I backed the files up immediately. Anyway now I have access to some stuff that I hadn't written about before and some images I am revisiting.
I did write about the Rokinon 24mm three years ago. At the time I had mostly used it on my digital camera. Since then I have used it a few times with film. I found it to be a good performer. Especially for a lens of this focal length that is usually fairly cheap. I remember I got this one for under $10 because the seller said there was a problem with haze. It turned out the haze was just some film from cigarette smoke that was easily cleaned. Even in good condition this lens was selling for around $20 to $30 on Ebay a few years ago. However I did look at recent sales on Ebay and it was selling for between $50 and $77. Not sure what the reason for the increase is other than people are using it on digital. And it does do well on digital where the crop factor can eliminate the edge problems that this lens can have.
So here are some images from the Rokinon 24mm. The B&W are on Legacy Pro 100. The color are Fuji 200. The last image of the Cinema Theater in Urbana IL, is where the late movie critic, Roger Ebert, watched movies when he was growing up. It was called The Princess Theater then. I also made a gallery a while back which mostly has digital images made using and M42 adapter.
Thursday, June 20, 2013
Yashica Auto Yashinon-DX 50mm f1.7
The Yashica Auto Yashinon DX 50mm f/1.7 lens was the standard lens for cameras like the Yashica TL Super. It was made in the 1960s. The image here is actually of the DS version of the lens. The DS was a later version. The lens design is the same, however the DS version lacks an auto/manual switch and at least in my opinion isn't as nicely made. Both lenses are single-coated. The last version of this lens is the DS-M. It is the same as the DS except that it is multi-coated. I scanned a booklet I have with all the Auto Yashinon lenses offered by Yashica in the mid-70's. You can see it in my Google Docs.
Here is what the lens looks like on the camera that it came with. The images here were made with a Canon digital SLR using an M42 adapter. I started out doing that when testing these lenses and have stuck with it since it gives me a consistent basis for comparison. I tend to think that these Auto Yashinon standard lenses are one of the great bargains in lenses. Usually you can pick one up on Ebay for between $20 and $30.
The images below are all with the lens at f/1.7.
Here is what the lens looks like on the camera that it came with. The images here were made with a Canon digital SLR using an M42 adapter. I started out doing that when testing these lenses and have stuck with it since it gives me a consistent basis for comparison. I tend to think that these Auto Yashinon standard lenses are one of the great bargains in lenses. Usually you can pick one up on Ebay for between $20 and $30.
The images below are all with the lens at f/1.7.
Wednesday, April 3, 2013
Kuribayashi C.C. Petri Orikkor 50mm f/2
The Petri Penta, first made in 1959, was the first in a series of Petri SLRs. Unlike later cameras in the series the Penta used the M42 lens mount. And that is the mount that the Petri Orikkor f/2 uses. I was pleased to see that I could give this lens a quick digital try-out using my M42 adapter.
The Petri Orikkor f/2 seems to be another of those lenses that has some mystery about exactly who made it. Normally the Orikkor lenses were made for Petri by Kyoei. However it seems that the design and quality of this lens is seen by many as not likely to have originated with Kyoei. Putting the issues of origins aside the quality of the build and design of the Orikkor is surprising high. The lens has a 7 element 4 group optical layout. The Orikkor f/2 is also unusual in that it has a cemented triplet in its rear element. If you are interested in a more complete discussion of the Orikkor f/2 than you will find it here.
I have to admit that I was surprised to find that the Orikkor is such an good performer. I saw it on the fairly humble Petri Penta and on a whim decided to check it out with my digital adapter. When the results much exceeded my expectations I went online and found the info above. One of the fun things about these old M42 lenses is that it is possible to find some gems that I wasn't aware of before.
Friday, September 21, 2012
Soligor 135mm f/2.8
Didn't want to let the week pass without making at least two posts. So here are a few images from the Soligor 135mm f/2.8. This one is at f/2.8
This one came along with the Pentax H1a that I got a couple of weeks ago. Like the H1a the lens is very clean and well-cared for. I haven't had a chance to do any research on the lens. I would guess it is from the same era as the H1a. Another at f/2.8
On my digital camera with a 1.6 crop factor this lens is 216mm.
So far I think the results are pretty good. I should have more on this lens in a future post.
This one came along with the Pentax H1a that I got a couple of weeks ago. Like the H1a the lens is very clean and well-cared for. I haven't had a chance to do any research on the lens. I would guess it is from the same era as the H1a. Another at f/2.8
On my digital camera with a 1.6 crop factor this lens is 216mm.
So far I think the results are pretty good. I should have more on this lens in a future post.
Friday, July 13, 2012
KMZ Helios 44-2 58mm F/2
Optical Formula: 6 elements in 4 groups.
Lens Mount: M42
Aperture Range: f/2 - f/16.
Minimum Focusing Distance: 0.5 meter
Aperture Blades: 8
Last summer I went on a small kick for getting cameras and lenses made in the USSR. The Helios 44-2 is one of those purchases. Strangely other then when I first got the Helios I haven't used it much. I say strangely because the quality of the images from this lens is mostly excellent. I rediscovered that when I decided to do a few posts about equipment from the USSR. I was very impressed by some of the results that I got with the Helios 44-2. I was also stuck by the idea that it would be best if I spent more time getting to know some of the cameras and lenses that I have gotten in the last year or two and spend less time working to get more. Seems like I have been in a pattern of testing out the newest thing and then moving on to the next newest thing. I think my new pattern will be to spend more time with what I already have.
The Helios 44-2 was the standard lens for many of the Zenit SLRs. It appears that it was made from the mid-60's to early 80's in the M42 mount. After that is was made, possibly even to the present day, in the K mount. The Helios 44-2 is copy of the design of the carl zeiss biotar 58mm f2, This design it said to work well in reducing optical aberrations. The Soviets appear to have done a good job in their use of this design because from my experience and from reviews that I have read the Helios 44-2 seems to be a very good lens. Probably the main problem you might have is that the Soviets are said not to have been very concerned with quality control. So if you do get a Helios 44-2 and get poor results it is likely that you have been unfortunate in having gotten a clunker.
The Helios 44-2 is said to have excellent bokah. I also find that it is pretty sharp wide-open.
Colors seem very natural with the Helios 44-2.
Because the earlier versions of the Helios 44-2 probably have just a single coating lack of contrast and flare could be a problem under some lighting conditions. I haven't run into such problems so far although so far I haven't used it much in conditions that might bring out that problem.
I believe that the Helios is my favorite purchase from the USSR. Although to some degree I have been pleased with all the items that I bought during my USSR phase. I also found the Ebay sellers from the former USSR countries to be excellent. Maybe I was just lucky however without an exception their descriptions of their items turned out to be accurate and their packaging and shipping speed was first-rate.
My plan now is to slow down and get to know some of my cameras better. I think that next in line is a couple of FEDs and a Zorki.
If you would like to see a little more of the results from this lens here is the KMZ Helios 44-2 58mm F/2 Gallery.
Lens Mount: M42
Aperture Range: f/2 - f/16.
Minimum Focusing Distance: 0.5 meter
Aperture Blades: 8
Last summer I went on a small kick for getting cameras and lenses made in the USSR. The Helios 44-2 is one of those purchases. Strangely other then when I first got the Helios I haven't used it much. I say strangely because the quality of the images from this lens is mostly excellent. I rediscovered that when I decided to do a few posts about equipment from the USSR. I was very impressed by some of the results that I got with the Helios 44-2. I was also stuck by the idea that it would be best if I spent more time getting to know some of the cameras and lenses that I have gotten in the last year or two and spend less time working to get more. Seems like I have been in a pattern of testing out the newest thing and then moving on to the next newest thing. I think my new pattern will be to spend more time with what I already have.
The Helios 44-2 was the standard lens for many of the Zenit SLRs. It appears that it was made from the mid-60's to early 80's in the M42 mount. After that is was made, possibly even to the present day, in the K mount. The Helios 44-2 is copy of the design of the carl zeiss biotar 58mm f2, This design it said to work well in reducing optical aberrations. The Soviets appear to have done a good job in their use of this design because from my experience and from reviews that I have read the Helios 44-2 seems to be a very good lens. Probably the main problem you might have is that the Soviets are said not to have been very concerned with quality control. So if you do get a Helios 44-2 and get poor results it is likely that you have been unfortunate in having gotten a clunker.
The Helios 44-2 is said to have excellent bokah. I also find that it is pretty sharp wide-open.
Colors seem very natural with the Helios 44-2.
Because the earlier versions of the Helios 44-2 probably have just a single coating lack of contrast and flare could be a problem under some lighting conditions. I haven't run into such problems so far although so far I haven't used it much in conditions that might bring out that problem.
I believe that the Helios is my favorite purchase from the USSR. Although to some degree I have been pleased with all the items that I bought during my USSR phase. I also found the Ebay sellers from the former USSR countries to be excellent. Maybe I was just lucky however without an exception their descriptions of their items turned out to be accurate and their packaging and shipping speed was first-rate.
My plan now is to slow down and get to know some of my cameras better. I think that next in line is a couple of FEDs and a Zorki.
If you would like to see a little more of the results from this lens here is the KMZ Helios 44-2 58mm F/2 Gallery.
Monday, July 9, 2012
Industar-50-2 50mm f/3.5
Mounted using an M42 adapter.
4 elements in 3 groups
4 elements in 3 groups
Weight: 65g
Produced: By KMZ from 1968 to 1991.
The Industar 50-2 was produced in large numbers in the old USSR. The lens is a Tessar design.
When I heard about the new Canon 40mm pancake lens I was reminded of the Industar 50-2 pancake lens that I have. While the Canon lens is considered a deal at around $200, the Industar 50-2 can usually be had for between $15 and $30. Of course the Industar 50-2 doesn't have auto focus and you do have to buy a M42 adapter for use with a digital camera. From the reviews of the Canon pancake it seems that it is a surprisingly good performer. I think the same can be said of the Industar 50-2. On a full frame camera the Industar is very sharp at the center falling off toward the corners. With a camera with a smaller sensor you will be leaving out a lot of the less sharp parts in return for a reduced focal range. So for example on the XSi above the lens becomes 80mm instead of 50mm.
I do have to say that a lens this small makes my slr seem much less visible. And the reduced weight is a pleasure. Still this is a lens where you do have to pay attention. There are no click stops on the aperture ring so it is necessary to look at the front of the lens when you are changing the aperture. Also since the aperture ring turns freely it is not hard to grab it and think I am turning the focusing ring. So like I said with this lens you do need to pay attention. And if you don't mind that then the Industar 50-2 can be a rewarding lens.
I am the sort of photographer who has taken a lot of pictures of sunflowers. That I took my favorite sunflower picture with the Industar 50-2 adds to my favorable view of the lens.
Here is the full image from which the crop below comes.
A crop from the image above when at 100%.
Some more images in the Industar 50-2 Gallery.
Wednesday, June 27, 2012
Auto Yashinon-DX 1:2.8 f = 28mm
M42 Screw Mount
f/2.8 - 16
8 elements in 7 groups
Filter size 62mm
Minimum focus 0.4 m
Weight 260 g
I got this lens with the Yashica TL Super in the photo. I think it was made sometime in the late 1960's or early 1970's. One thing that is nice about this lens on an APS camera is that the focal length becomes 45mm. So you pretty much have a standard lens. At least it is nice if you like a standard lens which I do. One problem I have read that people have with this lens on a DSLR is sometimes the rear lens element protrudes into the mirror. I haven't had a problem with that on Canon DSLR's. Still if you are thinking about getting one of these lens you should check what people say about this issue for your camera model.
In operation I find the Auto Yashinon-DX 1:2.8 very pleasant to use. It is a solid well-made lens that focuses smoothly. It also has half f stops. Typical of most Yashica lenses that I have used this is a sharp one. Sometimes I find the color a little muted, but accurate. Contrast is good. I find Yashica lenses to be excellent with B&W film although it looks like I haven't tried it with this one. That is all I can think to say about this lens. Below is the gallery so you can see for yourself.
Auto Yashinon-DX 1:2.8 Gallery
f/2.8 - 16
8 elements in 7 groups
Filter size 62mm
Minimum focus 0.4 m
Weight 260 g
I got this lens with the Yashica TL Super in the photo. I think it was made sometime in the late 1960's or early 1970's. One thing that is nice about this lens on an APS camera is that the focal length becomes 45mm. So you pretty much have a standard lens. At least it is nice if you like a standard lens which I do. One problem I have read that people have with this lens on a DSLR is sometimes the rear lens element protrudes into the mirror. I haven't had a problem with that on Canon DSLR's. Still if you are thinking about getting one of these lens you should check what people say about this issue for your camera model.
In operation I find the Auto Yashinon-DX 1:2.8 very pleasant to use. It is a solid well-made lens that focuses smoothly. It also has half f stops. Typical of most Yashica lenses that I have used this is a sharp one. Sometimes I find the color a little muted, but accurate. Contrast is good. I find Yashica lenses to be excellent with B&W film although it looks like I haven't tried it with this one. That is all I can think to say about this lens. Below is the gallery so you can see for yourself.
Auto Yashinon-DX 1:2.8 Gallery
Monday, June 25, 2012
Asahi Super-Takumar 1:4/150
Mounted on my old Canon XSi using an M42 adapter.
Manufactured: 1965—1967
Lens Elements: 5
Groups: 5
Maximum Aperture: f/4
Minimum Aperture: f/22
Minimum Focus: 6 ft
Weight: 324 g
I got this lens last summer when I was in a mania about getting M42 lens. It was an odd focal length, however it was also a Super Takumar going for what seemed like a low price. I have to admit that I haven't used it much. And that is not a knock on the lens. The build quality is excellent and it functions as smoothly as any lens that I have. The pictures it takes are also pretty sharp and I like the color rendition. Still it is a focal length that I don't use much.
I have been impressed by the color I get with the Asahi Super-Takumar 1:4/150.
In theory I like it that I can get a focal length of 240mm when using the Asahi Super-Takumar 1:4/150 with an APS camera. That is especially nice considering how small and light the lens is. Even at my advanced age it is easy to keep this lens steady handheld. So while I haven't used it much I do think this is a fine lens. It is certainly worth what they are selling for these days. And after writing this post I think I will use the Asahi Super-Takumar 1:4/150 a little more. I have been stuck on wide to standard lenses for a while so it might be good to get to know more about what I can do with a lens like the Asahi Super-Takumar 1:4/150.
Asahi Super-Takumar 1:4/150 Gallery
Manufactured: 1965—1967
Lens Elements: 5
Groups: 5
Maximum Aperture: f/4
Minimum Aperture: f/22
Minimum Focus: 6 ft
Weight: 324 g
I got this lens last summer when I was in a mania about getting M42 lens. It was an odd focal length, however it was also a Super Takumar going for what seemed like a low price. I have to admit that I haven't used it much. And that is not a knock on the lens. The build quality is excellent and it functions as smoothly as any lens that I have. The pictures it takes are also pretty sharp and I like the color rendition. Still it is a focal length that I don't use much.
I have been impressed by the color I get with the Asahi Super-Takumar 1:4/150.
In theory I like it that I can get a focal length of 240mm when using the Asahi Super-Takumar 1:4/150 with an APS camera. That is especially nice considering how small and light the lens is. Even at my advanced age it is easy to keep this lens steady handheld. So while I haven't used it much I do think this is a fine lens. It is certainly worth what they are selling for these days. And after writing this post I think I will use the Asahi Super-Takumar 1:4/150 a little more. I have been stuck on wide to standard lenses for a while so it might be good to get to know more about what I can do with a lens like the Asahi Super-Takumar 1:4/150.
Asahi Super-Takumar 1:4/150 Gallery
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)